I wrote this post "as I see paganism http://piergiorgioblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/come-vedo-il-paganesimo.html because long ago I read the book De Benoist "as can be pagans, "
http://www.calameo.com/boo
and no n was satisfied with his definition of modern paganism, since the author is too influenced by Nietzsche and does not take quite as well as modern philosophers of history (apollinei!) they have learned and conciliabilissimi overlap with the old paganism.
So I decided to write the post, to prove that a historical perspective immanentist (Vico, Hegel etc..) should not be necessarily interpreted as a secularization of the Judeo Christian god transcendent, but rather can be interpreted as an authentic spirituality and secular neo-pagan completely separate from the destiny of Christianity.
This has an impact also on the political point of view. In fact, you can then through the pagan culture and neo-pagan conceive a government truly democratic, that has so far failed because the concept of sovereignty that we have inherited comes from the secularization of the theological concept of Christian sovereignty of Almighty God (K. Schmitt). Since the Christian God is a God almighty, the concept of sovereignty Almighty is the origin of totalitarianism, because the monarchy, the sovereignty of the king, a mirror of God's sovereignty, it becomes absolute (see Bodin), but then, during the era of bourgeois -Member, become absolute the sovereignty of law, and then, during the dictatorships of the twentieth century, the sovereignty of the party (which becomes identical to the state). The statolatria dictatorships of the twentieth century is not so due to Hegel, but rather to the fact that the statolatria is actually partitolatria, ie the absolute sovereignty of the party.
identifying the state with the community, however, we can deduce logically a concept truly democratic politics (direct democracy) redesigning so the very notion of sovereignty away from the theological concepts.
0 comments:
Post a Comment