Since today is the day the invitations to read, I invite readers to read Edward Carr of the post-Bolshevik revolution.
I believe that despite the great work done by Lenin, it is possible to draw some conclusions:
a) the working class is not revolutionary, because there are situations in which he loses the desire to participate in power
b) the working class is revolutionary, because even if you conquered the factories, the bourgeois have a technical background that makes them indispensable
c) The centralization of Lenin (dictated by the historical conditions) was the prelude to the party burocraticizzazione
d) The folly of rapid industrialization has led to an unjustified use of force higher labor exploitation carried out under conditions of bourgeois liberalism (I refer especially to investment in heavy industry)
I am for federalism (as opposed to centralism and State), for direct democracy (as opposed to parties but to the community ) and for harmony between the classes. They are for the measure, so do not welcome the idea of \u200b\u200bthe enormous profit, which, as explained Weber, was ultimately a religious character. Are communitarian, neither right nor left.
0 comments:
Post a Comment