Pokemon Dawn Up Skirt

PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY CORPORATE LIFE: Reflections

I dream that the parties are corporations of trades, all equally represented.

Dream "participatory democracy corporate."

Who better entrepreneur, worker, knows what laws you need to work right? The big capitalist finances the party for his individual interest, then why are there so many lawyers in parliament shyster ....

Collaboration can instead benefit everyone except the big multinational.

Unfortunately, there are ways and ways of understanding the economy and development ..... The risk with the parties of today,

is that even when they are not funded by big capitalists, are the springboard for bureaucrats, careerists eager

of personal power.

The result is that the economy of a nation or region is in crisis, while some individual benefits from the destruction of the community to do its interests and personal enrichment. The rich get richer and the poor ever more poor: in fact the rich are few, and their parliamentary system individualistic right, while the poor need the approach-democratic corporate policy, why suffer more than rich the lack of economic competitiveness of the nation.

NOTE: democracy guild has nothing to do with what we saw in the twentieth century: the dictatorship abolished all parties except one, and have silenced the representatives of the guilds (unions). The party dictatorial twentieth century is rooted totalitarian in the rise of the bourgeoisie, as I had to point out in my other previous posts (including "the genesis and evolution of totalitarianism: policy considerations").

NOTE 2:

Those who know my philosophy, knows that I do not mean in the sense of democratic dictatorship (as is fashionable among some socialist and Leninist), but direct and participatory, since I believe that dictatorships are degeneration typical of the bourgeois conception of the political party. Totalitarianism arises with the bourgeoisie (which absolute power to the king at the time of Louis XIV) and finds perfect expression in the relationship between party and masses in the twenty-first century (see my post "" genesis and evolution of totalitarianism: policy considerations ") .

NOTE 3: The legislative power should be equally divided between representatives of different professions, when it is not possible to grant direct democracy is for each worker. For example: the guild of artisans. Each artisan should at least be able to vote directly to the representatives of his corporation (its "party"), when it can not directly vote and write the laws. All corporations (craftsmen, traders, etc..) Should have the same number of representatives.