introduce our discussion by distinguishing the mass of the community. The mass that we understand it is not the mass in the sense of poor people, of the poor. The mass that we mean refers to a concept more modern. The mass is the product of media-culture on the conscience of individuals, is the product of the capacity of the media to influence the minds, tastes, values, leisure activities of individuals.
The mass is the product of elites, who are now able to use technical tools increasingly refined to control the relationships between people, so as to give the illusion of freedom.
The community is instead the aggregate of people with critical skills, and derive mutual benefit from joining in a project, or the unit in certain values \u200b\u200bfree product within the community itself. The community is the thing most feared by both totalitarian regimes of right and left (who made extensive use of media in an authoritarian way to save power), both free market (in which profit, not power, it becomes the end that justifies the formation of the earth).
consider that every individual of the mass lost, entering the mass, much of his intelligence. The question is: how did the modern (including schemes right) to cancel the community and to build mass? Perhaps the atomism of capitalism is not only not incompatible with the flow, but requires the formation and consolidation of the mass, which is the opposite of the community ....
It 'obvious that the quality of life of many has grown, but the credit is not up to my view of capitalism, but rather the advancement of science and technology, used for positive purpose.
you think the masses will be able to return to the community, breaking down the media system and building themselves their own values, without elite who monipolino spirit?
will be able mass to bring down the domain and technical media elites, or there is no possibility of redemption for the masses, there is no possibility for the future project of the community?
In these my questions, there's something serious: the philosophical project of communitarianism against individualistic project of Nietzsche. Communitarianism provides for the liberation of the whole people by its being in the service of mass production and the goods, while the draft Nietzsche seems to me a draft release of the single tax standardization through the use of technology, political and economic elites . There is hope of redemption for all, or only the individual can take the road of liberation? I would hope the first case .... The freed man, the strange man to the ground, should guide the masses through the use of technology, he goes back to this community. Free radio stations, for example, were certainly a tool of freedom ... the saturation of the word mediated through the dictatorship of the journalistic pursuit of gossip, the pseudo-scandal is not compromising, it is a real possibility of censorship resistance Community .
0 comments:
Post a Comment