Rose Garden Seating Chart Row E

REVOLUTION 'and

REALITY 'and VITA

Reality = synthesis.

Dialectic: the road to the truth,

ie, the real, learned through

through the negative.

There are those who cross the negative and there

those unfamiliar with the dialectic, and

remains in the negative. Whoever remains in

negative can not understand the Royal

because the real is not the positive or

the negative: the real is more than

them, and them covering both

but only as moments.

Science in the broadest sense,

sees objectivity as a moment

of the way to the real. The real

is not something that you know.

The positive and negative are known, ie

moments. The real fact is not

by the moments, the moments are the path that leads to real

. The moments are real

before.

Do you know the real, you know

the movement that leads to real

but this movement (= dialectic) is not only known

epistemology, but lived

ontologically.

phenomena are known, but the phenomena are not the real

. The phenomena are the result

division of the real

in our intellect.

intellect that approaches the real

it apart and then reassembling it becomes itself

real synthesis: the intellect becomes

psyche, spirit, putting

first as an impartial observer, that is as

something unreal, which does not affect

realtà.Il real

synthesis of subject and object: They

removed, and synthesis, intersubjectivity,

is what remains (the real-time, present,

not only thought).

Classical physics has had to deal with

its limits, but these limits are no more

, philosophically speaking, that the passage of the intellect

dall'irrealtà

to reality. With the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg

, it turns the mind, the observer,

as real, and not as a pre-real. Here's the science

came to reality, but in doing so has had to abandon

epistemology.

Knowledge has no other object than

to conduct the pre-real reality.

Everything that has gone down this road

dialectic, where the pre-real is constituted by the positive

(subject) and negative (object)

that are conceived as separate, and do not interact

. Each interaction is real,

every interaction is the dissolution of the subject-object. Interaction is life, existence. The two plans, ontological and epistemological, are formed respectively as a reality and as a pre-reality. The contents of the knowledge they dissolve into reality and become real life. Natural science deals with reality, and explains it in terms of pre-real. The humanities are instead the real itself, are absolute spirit. The humanities can not explain anything: art, poetry, philosophy, they are life. They are the present of the human spirit, and live in the psyche, not in books. A poem read without the spirit is not alive, life is the spirit that uses the word to be realized. But what art, what was the philosophy, first to accomplish? Something unconscious, pre-real. Psychoanalysis attempts to explain the human spirit in the same way that the natural sciences explain the physical space, ie passing from real to pre-real. In practice, however, the analyst lives of intersubjectivity, of real lives. The psychoanalyst must study the patients (explained by the pre-real), but must also interact with them, contribute to a therapeutic relationship (moving from pre-psychoanalytic theory to real-real).

These are the two movements of science.

The movement from the real to real is the pre-assumption of the technique, that is knowledge which is realized. Art is a unique creation, the technical action is instead a realization repeatable, and as such it is technical. E 'repeated because its implementation has in itself the germ of the movement from reality to pre-real, has in it the seed of knowledge.