Sunday, October 3, 2010

Baci Chocolate Calgary

Nietzsche and Kierkegaard: Two complementary opposites or two? The

"in some remote corner of the universe, pour in the glitter of countless solar systems, there once was a monster, on which intelligent animals invented knowledge. Was the most presumptuous and minutes liar in the history of the world, however, was only a few breaths minuto.Dopo of our nature is coagulated, and the clever animals had to die!
"


This aphorism by Nietzsche seems to say that knowledge does not exist, that life is tragic, and that knowledge, his Socratic spirit, is a lie invented by people who wanted to hide the reality.

Nietzsche says, "there are no facts, only interpretations." For Nietzsche as the first Greek life is a tragedy in that it is subject to becoming. The first Greeks do not understand, they feel in their spirit, the influence of reality, and transform it through art.

Then come those who want to deny reality, and substitute the reality of knowledge. Nietzsche argues, saying that their knowledge is not knowledge of reality, ie facts, but it's just interpretation, that is defensive mechanism to hide the tragic element of human existence.


E 'vision, his, in part similar to that of the early Greeks. A vision aristocratic. What is missing in Nietzsche is perhaps the idea of \u200b\u200bprovidence in the greek sense of the word. There is something about him that makes him a little more Christian. Perhaps its individualism, its aristocracy that is not tied to a role as a Community in Greece, but has a function purely subjective, individual. In some ways looks more like a greek existentialist Kierkegaard: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche who is the tragic element but lacks the community element.

0 comments:

Post a Comment