"" "More broadly. Invokes the philosophical strand of Platonic and Neo-Platonic, which is a landmark. As essential to Hegel to Schelling. For 'theological experience of this line of thought is the ssoluto "nothing" because it can not be conceived through categorical determinations that characterize the finite. Therefore, one can refer to it only through via the negation of negative theology, in which the absolute is characterized to be nothing of any certainty, unfathomable abyss in which all sinks and sinks any certainty, from the absolute origin has nothing at the same time all the multiplicity of the finite. [The way you seem dogmatic negation marzio? And 'the way that logic follows Hegel in denying the finiteness of the bodies]. So we have nothing to do with being, but only as a reality, "SUPER-Essentia" is not reducible to being, gender determination that characterizes it is. Plato, the Absolute One as is "BE OUTSIDE THE" epekeina ousias tes. In this sense, is the absolute infinity which sinks each determination, and whose success is linked closely with the determinate negation. [Hegel in fact the reason includes the determinate negation of being, that is nothing like anything ]...... Terms and abyss are not used to say that the absolute is unknowable, but that must be overcome and the categorical structures the mean of the finite to know. The absolute is not
pirvazione total being and essence (nihil absolutum), but the fullness of being and essence, without limitation. [This sentence is important, review them --->] And if every finite, as it poses as a determined, precisely because this is how negation in front of it is what defines him and denies it all. The absolute is constituted as an absolute negation, as the supreme contradiction, which is an expression of full coincidentia oppositorum [I do not know if you've read anything as Echkart Monk, Bohme, or even Cusano]. So nothing is outside of the absolute, all [even the finite] is through and in the absolute. Identity is set difference being is nothing, and these are expressions of the absolute. [The absolute is in progress, is the same as becoming. Here is the echo of Heraclitus. Here's the whole tragedy of the spirit greek which is listed on the scene of the philosophy in place "immutable modern", ie instead of the fact positivistic, or in place of the Christian god. Hegel anticipates Nietzsche, in a sense he knew everything already. The criticism that Severino is to Parmenides and Aristotle (he argued that they can become anything) seems to undermine the idea of \u200b\u200bbecoming. But beware, Severino does not come to terms with the logic dihegel fund, rejects a priori. I, with the "no objection to severino" contradicts him, saying: even though it is formally correct proof is that being and nothingness can not be the be, this position is not consistent from institution to be certified when the formal placing particular body becomes our view, that is in the system. The local authority in the appearance of a specific content, that formal logic ignores, since it ignores the content, which is always something true, real, like the shape. Hegel's logic is not an argument, because it is not formal, it is not dogmatic but rather because it does not say, but contains within itself the negation, is a union of form and content]. Anyway
the extract from the book "logical political metaphysics. Ruggiu louis Hegel in Jena." [] <--- sono i miei commenti.
0 comments:
Post a Comment